My information about this new Oppenheimer instance appear not only regarding my personal direct wedding with it, also due to my role for a few decades given that the advice to your AEC’s Division out of Security and you may my close personal matchmaking then and since upcoming with a high AEC defense officials
Kenneth D. Nichols, the latest AEC’s General Movie director, necessary with the Percentage the Gray Board’s conclusions and testimonial of Can get twenty seven, 1954, become acknowledged, and also the Percentage into the June twenty-eight, 1954, given their five-to-one to decision (Henry D. Brand new Oppenheimer case made higher social conflict at that time, and over recent years might have been the main topic of multiple guides and you may stuff. Very commentators provides interpreted possible due to the fact an excellent vendetta towards the part of Lewis L. Strauss, then-president of your AEC, or of military officials (generally the Air Push) against Oppenheimer on the basis of personality and you will/or policy clashes. The most recent review, by the Jack Holl, one of several specialized historians of your nuclear opportunity program is demonstrated on Western Historic Association’s standard meeting in the December 1975.
Which investigations is considering considerable credence on account of new elite group reputation and integrity of specialized historians and because the membership will be based upon overall, uninhibited entry to AEC data. Simply speaking, the fresh Holl membership problems the scene that case originated an excellent Strauss vendetta against Oppenheimer. 继续阅读Smyth dissented) up against restoration of Oppenheimer’s clearance